Rahul Gandhi Visit Rekindles Debate on Dalit Safety in Uttar Pradesh

Rahul Gandhi’s visit to Hariom Valmiki’s family in Raebareli renews concerns over Dalit safety, justice delivery, and the state’s accountability in Uttar Pradesh

Update: 2025-10-17 16:32 GMT

Rahul Gandhi’s visit to the family of Hariom Valmiki in Raebareli has once again brought into the national spotlight a question India has failed to answer even seventy-five years after independence — are Dalits truly safe in the world’s largest democracy? His assertion that the “murder has shaken the conscience of the entire nation” was not merely a political indictment; it was a moral charge against the functioning of the state and its institutions. The killing of Hariom Valmiki, allegedly lynched by villagers who mistook him for a thief, underscores the fragility of constitutional protections meant for the most vulnerable communities. It is a brutal reminder that the promise of equality enshrined in the Constitution is being undermined by deep-rooted social prejudice and administrative apathy.

According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), Uttar Pradesh accounts for nearly 25 percent of all crimes against Scheduled Castes in India. In 2023 alone, over 14,000 cases of atrocities against Dalits were recorded in the state — a staggering figure that highlights both the persistence of caste-based violence and the inability of successive governments to provide deterrence. While the BJP government under Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath claims that law and order has improved, the recurring instances of mob lynching, custodial deaths, and caste-driven assaults reveal another picture altogether. Rahul Gandhi’s criticism that Dalit oppression is “at its peak” under this government is not without statistical backing. The data clearly indicates that Uttar Pradesh remains one of the most dangerous states in India for Dalits, despite tall claims of “zero tolerance” toward crime.

The government’s handling of the Hariom Valmiki case reflects a familiar pattern — swift arrests and loud assurances followed by administrative defensiveness and attempts to control the narrative. Before Rahul Gandhi’s visit, the victim’s brother, Shivam Valmiki, released a video appealing to political parties not to “politicise” the matter. The Congress has alleged that this was the result of pressure tactics by the state machinery to neutralise Rahul’s intervention. Whether or not the allegation is true, the very existence of such suspicion exposes how political control over justice delivery has corroded public faith. The state’s announcement of compensation, job offers, and housing benefits to the family may provide immediate relief, but it cannot substitute for institutional accountability. Justice, in cases like this, often becomes an administrative transaction rather than a constitutional guarantee.

Rahul Gandhi’s visit was not an isolated act of empathy; it was part of his broader political narrative about restoring constitutional morality. His post on X — “Is being a Dalit still a deadly crime in this country?” — strikes at the core of India’s democratic self-image. The question is rhetorical yet piercing. If being Dalit still invites suspicion, violence, or humiliation, then the state has failed to translate the moral vision of B.R. Ambedkar into lived reality. Gandhi’s framing of the issue as one of systemic failure, rather than merely local brutality, also exposes how caste violence continues to thrive under the cover of administrative negligence and social complicity.

The government, on its part, has attempted to project swift action. Within days, 14 accused were arrested, including the main culprit, who was caught after an encounter. The Chief Minister personally met Hariom’s family, offering assurances of justice, employment, and housing. These gestures, however, appear more reactionary than reformative. They address the optics, not the roots. In the last five years, NCRB data shows that conviction rates in Dalit atrocity cases hover around 28 percent — meaning that more than two-thirds of the accused go unpunished. Without systemic reform in police investigation and judicial processes, the cycle of violence and compensation will continue, each new incident repeating the same hollow ritual of promises and outrage.

Rahul Gandhi’s statement that “justice cannot be put under house arrest” was not just an emotional remark but a sharp commentary on how the state often uses administrative power to contain political dissent and public empathy. His visit was heavily barricaded, the lane to the victim’s house sealed — a symbolic image of how the state shields itself from scrutiny. This is not the first time Rahul has tried to position himself as the voice of the marginalised, but in the current context of rising social polarization, his gesture has a deeper political resonance. For a party seeking revival, the Dalit question could once again become a moral anchor — much like during the days of Jawaharlal Nehru’s emphasis on social justice and Indira Gandhi’s call for Garibi Hatao.

However, the issue transcends partisan lines. Whether it is Hathras, Unnao, or now Raebareli, each incident erodes the faith of the marginalised in the justice system. The persistence of such violence points not only to caste prejudice among ordinary citizens but also to systemic indifference embedded in the state’s institutions — police, bureaucracy, and even sections of the judiciary. When the oppressed see that the law bends for the powerful and breaks the weak, democracy loses its moral legitimacy.

Rahul Gandhi’s intervention, therefore, should be seen as a wake-up call rather than mere political theatre. His demand for accountability is rooted in a constitutional ethos that transcends party politics. The real question is whether India’s political and administrative structures are willing to confront their own complicity in perpetuating caste violence. As long as Dalit lives remain negotiable and justice transactional, no amount of rhetoric about “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas” can mask the systemic rot.

Hariom Valmiki’s murder is not an isolated crime; it is a mirror reflecting the contradictions of modern India — a country that celebrates digital empowerment and economic growth while its citizens are still killed for their caste identity. Rahul Gandhi’s words, though political, echo a painful truth: until justice becomes a lived reality for the most marginalised, the conscience of the nation will remain deeply unsettled.

Tags:    

Similar News